A federal magistrate judge has rejected a plaintiff’s argument that his frequent business trips to Russia put him at risk of suffering “bodily harm” and as a result he should be able to preserve testimony, by self-deposition, for a suit in which he is plaintiff and in a parallel securities action.

In granting a protective order precluding Michael P. Tierney from taking his own deposition on Sept. 25, Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz said that Tierney’s “purported concern with the possibility of being murdered on a business trip” was not an exceptional circumstance, and, in any case, gave rise to skepticism.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]