Allegations that a prominent Manhattan art dealer appraised a painting by Paul Gauguin at millions of dollars above its value without revealing that the dealer had an “ownership interest” in the piece have been dismissed.

Supreme Court Justice Emily Jane Goodman, in Mandarin Trading v. Wildenstein, 602648/06, said plaintiff Mandarin Trading, a company based in the Bahamas, failed to prove that Wildenstein & Co. and its president, Guy Wildenstein, “owed any fiduciary duty or relation of trust and confidence.” She also denied Mandarin’s request for rescission of the transaction and award of damages.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]