The Department of Justice’s latest effort to deal with complaints about prosecutors inappropriately seeking waivers of attorney-client privilege in corporate investigations often falls short of providing meaningful protection, according to a report to a Senate committee by a former Delaware chief justice.

In a submission to the Senate Judiciary Committee, former Chief Justice E. Norman Veasey, senior partner in New York’s Weil, Gotshal & Manges, said he agreed, at the request of the Coalition to Protect the Attorney-Client Privilege, to act as a pro bono, “neutral” recipient of actual experiences by defense counsel with the so-called McNulty Memorandum, named for former Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, which provided new restrictions on prosecutors seeking privileged information from companies.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]