In the first five legal tests of the power of eminent domain since the New Jersey Supreme Court tightened the definition of “blighted” property that qualifies, two trial judges and three Appellate Division panels have scuttled redevelopment projects.

The proposed projects ranged from a trailer park to a 2,000-condominium project, but in all five, property owners relied on Gallenthin Realty Development v. Borough of Paulsboro, 191 N.J. 344 (June 13, 2007), which holds that a municipality can’t meet the state constitution’s “blight” standard simply by declaring a tract not fully productive.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]