Section 101(31) of the Bankruptcy Code, the provision of the code that defines those who are “insiders” of a debtor, continues to generate litigation almost 30 years after its enactment. Last week the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Rupp v. United Security Bank (In re Kunz), dealt with a matter of first impression involving �101(31) (A). That issue was whether a “director emeritus” is per se an insider.

The debtor, Kunz, was involved in the initial organization of United Security Bank. Kunz served as a member of United’s board for many years, finally resigning in 1990. Upon resigning, he took the title of director emeritus, a title he held during the one-year period prior to his bankruptcy filing. According to the court, although a director in name, Kunz did not attend meetings of the United board; had no decision-making powers, office or staff; and was not entitled to “attend any meeting on United’s business.” Compensation for Kunz (and others with the same title) was set at $400 per month.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]