Expert testimony is not required when a plaintiff bases a child sexual abuse claim on recalled memories, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
Rather, a jury should be allowed to assess the credibility of the plaintiff’s testimony in the same way it would any other lay witness, the court decided unanimously in Phillips v. Gelpke, A-1-06.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]