A couple of tips before arguing in the California Supreme Court: Don't give an impudent answer or try to sneak in evidence that's not before the court. Two attorneys, both well respected in the appellate world, recently made those mistakes during oral arguments in a case about malicious prosecution, and each time the offender was put in place -- sharply.
May 16, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A couple of tips before arguing in the California Supreme Court: Don’t give an impudent answer or attempt to sneak in evidence that’s not before the court.
Two attorneys recently made those mistakes during oral arguments in a case about malicious prosecution, and each time the offender was put in place — sharply.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
