After a lateral move earlier this month by an intellectual property partner from Reed Smith left the two sides disputing the defecting attorney's title while at Reed Smith, some interesting insights appeared into how attorneys are permitted to market themselves in large law firms. The question then arose: Should firms allow attorneys to take on titles that bring with them no delegated responsibilities but could potentially present marketing opportunities for the firms and attorneys?
April 23, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
While a rose by any other name may smell as sweet, an attorney by just any title seems to leave a bitter taste.
After a lateral move earlier this month by an intellectual property partner from Reed Smith left the two sides disputing the defecting attorney’s title while at Reed Smith, some interesting insights appeared into how attorneys are permitted to market themselves in large law firms.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
