Naturists have been taking their clothes off in the name of art and free expression at Florida's MacArthur Beach for more than 20 years. But when Sole v. Wyner -- a case that stems from a protest staged by naturists forming a nude peace symbol on the public beach -- is argued before the Supreme Court on April 17, the First Amendment will probably not even get a mention. Instead, the issue will be attorney fees, argued in a context that may be crucial for the future of all public interest litigation.
April 10, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Toni Anne Wyner has been taking her clothes off in the name of art and free expression at MacArthur Beach in South Florida for more than 20 years.
But when the case that bears her name, Sole v. Wyner, is argued before the Supreme Court April 17, the First Amendment will probably not even get a mention.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
