The stakes were especially high in last week’s oral argument before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in AARP v. EEOC, a case that could directly impact more than 10 million retired workers by deciding whether a federal agency has the power to tell employers that they are allowed to reduce health care benefits for retirees as soon as they become eligible for Medicare.

And the issues were especially complicated, so much so that the judges at times seemed to be scratching their heads and struggling to find the proper focus.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]