For a Georgia judge Tuesday, the key questions in a dispute involving Duane Morris were: "Did the law firm create a conflict of interest when it agreed to represent a Georgia client against a large corporation, even as it represented another division of the same company in a Pennsylvania bankruptcy? And despite the end of the Pennsylvania case and Duane Morris' withdrawal from it, is the firm still conflicted from the Georgia case?" For an attorney appearing for McKesson Corp., the answer was a firm "yes."
March 01, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In asking a Fulton County, Ga., judge to toss out an injunction she issued last year and reopen — then dismiss — the underlying case, Emmett J. Bondurant made clear that he had no desire to re-argue a case already decided against his client, the Duane Morris law firm.
Instead, he said, the issues in the earlier case are themselves no longer relevant, and the injunction unnecessary.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
