Litigants wanting to use information hammered out during confidential mediations must make that perfectly clear in writing, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday.

The court said parties must go beyond the vague language of a state statute that allows parties to use a settlement agreement prepared during mediation in later legal proceedings — if the document specifically says it’s admissible, subject to disclosure or “words to that effect.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]