In August, Dallas lawyers Fred Baron and Lisa Blue filed a breach of contract suit against plaintiffs firm Baron & Budd over payments for the sale of their equity interest in the firm. Now, in a counterclaim, Baron & Budd alleges that Baron and Blue breached contractual, fiduciary and legal obligations to the firm by failing to receive prior consent from Baron & Budd for plans to form a new firm -- with Houston plaintiffs lawyer W. Mark Lanier and others -- to handle Vioxx litigation against Merck & Co.
December 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The breach of contract suit Dallas lawyers Fred Baron and Lisa Blue filed against Dallas plaintiffs firm Baron & Budd over payments for the sale of their equity interest in the firm to shareholder Russell Budd just got a whole lot more interesting.
Baron and Blue allege in the original petition they filed in August that the firm and others including Budd conspired to deny them payments due under the sale contracts.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
