The N.J. Supreme Court has two cases on its docket that will decide the availability of whistleblower protection for large numbers of contract workers -- including lawyers for public entities. One case will likely determine whether whistleblower protections extend to municipal public defenders, municipal prosecutors, planning board attorneys and lawyers who contract with public entities in other capacities. The second case could yield a ruling generally applicable to all independent contractors.
November 07, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New Jersey Supreme Court has two cases on its docket that will decide the availability of whistleblower protection for large numbers of contract workers — including lawyers for public entities.
Both cases have broad ramifications. One, Stomel v. City of Camden, A-45/46-06, will likely determine whether whistleblower protections extend to municipal public defenders, municipal prosecutors, planning board attorneys and lawyers who contract with public entities in a variety of other capacities.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
