In an eagerly awaited ruling on the admissibility of expert testimony, the Court of Appeals on Tuesday left no question that a solid scientific foundation must support allegations of toxic tort injury. But it also rejected a 2nd Department calculus that would have erected a high hurdle for plaintiffs claiming they were injured by exposure to carcinogens.

Tuesday’s holding in Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp., 107, was a mixed bag for attorneys and courts looking for guidance, and for toxic tort victims looking for relief.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]