During an Oct. 27 conference, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to hear a 3rd Circuit case that would test whether a court can enjoin the Justice Department's Antitrust Division from withdrawing immunity promised under its Corporate Leniency Program. The case piques the interest of antitrust lawyers as well as white-collar criminal defense attorneys, because the lifting of immunity means that all evidence a cooperating company has willingly handed over could then be used by the government.
October 18, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A 3rd Circuit case at the door of the U.S. Supreme Court will test the federal government’s power to revoke immunity from prosecution granted to antitrust violators who agree to rat on their rivals.
During an Oct. 27 conference, the Court will decide whether to hear Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. U.S., 06-97, which would test whether a court can enjoin the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division from withdrawing immunity promised under its Corporate Leniency Program.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
