The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case that could force telecommunications companies to compensate pay-telephone providers billions of dollars for so-called 10-10-220 calls made by consumers, legal experts said. The case stems from federal laws and regulations requiring long-distance telephone companies to compensate pay-phone providers for calls that consumers make using special dialing codes, commonly known as 10-10-220 or coinless calls.
October 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case that could force telecommunications companies to compensate pay-telephone providers billions of dollars for so-called 10-10-220 calls made by consumers, legal experts said.
The case stems from federal laws and regulations requiring long-distance telephone companies to compensate pay-phone providers for calls that consumers make using special dialing codes, commonly known as 10-10-220 or coinless calls.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
