Goldfish and tabby cats don’t often rise to a hot topic of discussion, much less debate, in California’s appellate courts.
Yet there was plenty of both at the 4th District Court of Appeal last week, in a case that questioned what kind of pets a convict should be allowed to keep secret from his probation officer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]