A third-party insurer cannot be sued for bad faith if it ultimately settles a case within policy limits even if it allegedly refused to settle a claim despite the insured’s admission of liability and instead engaged in “delay tactics” that led to four years of litigation, a federal judge has ruled.

In his 10-page opinion in Daniel P. Fuss Builders-Contractors Inc. v. Assurance Company of America, U.S. District Judge Berle M. Schiller predicted that the Pennsylvania courts would hold that there is no recognized cause of action against an insured for delaying settlement of a third-party claim.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]