In a case of first impression, a Manhattan Supreme Court justice has held that a former employee did not bring in a timely manner state and city employment discrimination claims originally dismissed without prejudice in a federal court.
The ruling offers cautionary advice to practitioners puzzled by the arcana of overlapping procedure in federal and state courts and the distinctions between terms like “action” and “claim.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
