According to plaintiffs lawyers, a $172 million verdict — including $115 million in punitive damages — wasn’t enough to stop America’s largest retailer from continuing to violate California’s meal and rest break law.

The question of compliance by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. — and whether the company should have a court-appointed supervisor watching over its shoulder — is playing out this week in a trial before Alameda County, Calif., Superior Court Judge Ronald Sabraw.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]