Rotation of judges is usually deemed a good thing, helping to foster a well-rounded bench and to ensure that no judge gets burned out in a bum assignment.
But to hear Francine Schott tell it, rotation equals gender discrimination if the new assignment is less enjoyable than the old, and she wants the court system to pay damages in consequence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]