Although the U.S. Supreme Court last week ducked the questions everyone expected it to answer in two unrelated challenges under RICO, the justices did tighten the reins on the law generally viewed by the business community as a legal plague.

Even though the Court on Monday turned aside E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.’s petition in a Benlate case, the issues not resolved last week — the scope of the “enterprise” definition in RICO and whether “reliance” is required in RICO mail and wire fraud claims — will continue to divide the lower courts and inevitably return to the Supreme Court, according to RICO litigators and scholars.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]