The Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the children of an ice cream man shot dead in a botched robbery attempt. The case has raised questions about the level of control that differentiates the employer-employee relationship from that between an owner and an independent contractor. The man's children claimed that Jack & Jill Ice Cream's detailed oversight of the manner in which their father conducted his ice cream sales was proof of an employer-employee relationship.
May 15, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the children of a local ice cream man shot dead in July 2001 following a botched robbery attempt.
Alameri v. Simco Sales Service of Pennsylvania Inc. has raised questions about the level of control that differentiates the employer-employee relationship from that which exists between an owner and an independent contractor.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
