Although the “attractive nuisance” theory of liability is most often applied to young children who suffer injuries while trespassing, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled that it may also be used by two 17-year-old boys who suffered serious burns from catenary wires when they climbed atop a parked railroad car.
In his 25-page opinion in Klein v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel found that Pennsylvania courts have recognized the attractive nuisance theory — outlined in �339 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts — as a valid exception to the general liability standard for trespassers, and that no Pennsylvania court has ever set an arbitrary age limit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]