The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently proposed new rules that, if adopted, will require patent continuation applicants to show why their “amendment, argument, or evidence presented could not have been previously submitted.” 71 Fed. Reg. 48-61 (Jan. 3, 2006). Comments to the proposed rules are due on May 3. The proposed rules would apply to any second or subsequent continued examination filings, whether a continuation application, a continuation-in-part application or a request for continued examination.
The PTO asserts that “current continued examination practice … [is] impairing the Office’s ability to examine new applications without real certainty that these practices effectively advance prosecution, improve patent quality, or serve the typical applicant or the public.” But the PTO acknowledges that its “proposed requirements for seeking second and subsequent continuations will not have an effect on the vast majority of patent applications.” According to PTO 2005 statistics, fewer than 7 percent of applications would be affected by the proposed rules.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]