A group angered by last year's U.S. Supreme Court decision giving local governments more power to seize people's homes for economic development had petitioned to use the ruling to evict Justice David Souter from his farmhouse to make way for the "Lost Liberty Hotel." But residents of Weare, N.H., rejected that idea on Saturday, replacing protesters' intended ballot proposal with a call to strengthen New Hampshire's law on eminent domain.
February 07, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Residents of Weare, N.H., on Saturday rejected a proposal to evict U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter from his farmhouse to make way for the “Lost Liberty Hotel.”
A group angered by last year’s court decision that gave local governments more power to seize people’s homes for economic development had petitioned to use the ruling against the justice.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...
Exciting Career Opportunities at Nuzzo & Roberts! Nuzzo & Roberts, a leading mid-sized insurance defense firm based in Cheshire, CT...
