Now that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has implemented a new regulation on legal malpractice disclosure, the next step for practitioners is to figure out how to comply with the letter and the spirit of the state's new rule. Many lawyers -- in particular, small firm or solo practitioners -- had expressed opposition to the rule's adoption. And even lawyers at big firms have blanched at the prospect of having to bring up the possibility of malpractice at the outset of their client relationships.
January 12, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Now that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has, as expected, implemented Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4(c), the next step for practitioners is to figure out what they have to do to comply with the letter — and the spirit — of the state’s new regulation on legal malpractice disclosure.
Many lawyers — in particular, small firm or solo practitioners — had expressed opposition to the rule’s adoption.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
