The Supreme Court refused Monday to muscle into a dispute between motorcycle group the Hells Angels and California law enforcement agencies over the shooting of three family pets during a police search. That means officers can be sued by the biker group over 1998 raids that an appeals court said went too far. The case presented an interesting question for the justices: What type of constitutional protection does someone have when police executing a search warrant shoot a pet?
December 06, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court refused Monday to muscle into a dispute between motorcycle group the Hells Angels and California law enforcement agencies over the shooting of three family pets during a police search.
That means officers can be sued by the biker group over 1998 raids that an appeals court said went too far.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
