Chief Justice John Roberts took himself out of a patent infringement case Wednesday because of a conflict, acknowledging he made a mistake in taking part in the early stages of the appeal. His former law firm, Hogan & Hartson, had filed the appeal on behalf of a company accused of infringing on the patent for a test that helps predict strokes, heart attacks and dementia. Roberts did not explain why he was recusing himself from the case, which justices announced on Monday that they would review.
November 04, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Consulting magazine is proud to recognize this unique group of movers & shakers at our annual Rising Stars of Profession awards.
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
Duane Morris LLP has an opening in its Houston office for a corporate associate to join its growing practice. The ideal candidate will hav...
Morrison Mahoney LLP seeks a civil litigation insurance defense attorney for its New York City office. Areas of Concentration: ...
Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP mourns the loss of cofounder and original Managing Partner, Mark B. Feinstein.
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
