Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When Ward Coffee Co. near Samuel Alito Jr.’s chambers in Newark, N.J., named a designer espresso “Judge Alito’s Bold Justice Blend,” his law clerk joked that the “bold” referred to both the coffee and the judge. Five years later, the blend of Java, Celebes and New Guinea beans remains a best seller. But will the Senate and the American public buy the brand of bold conservativism Alito displayed in 300 majority opinions and dissents in his 15 years on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals? A quick examination of those opinions leaves no doubt that the 55-year-old judge President Bush nominated on Monday to replace centrist Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has a record to satisfy Bush’s constituents on the right. On abortion, employee and criminal defendant rights, First Amendment and business issues, Alito has landed, consistently, on the conservative side. At the same time, his Ivy League credentials, his reputation for brilliance and an ability to spend 25 years in public life without an apparent blemish seem to make him a compelling candidate. Critics comparing Alito with another conservative justice of Italian descent — Antonin Scalia — have called him “Scalito” or “Scalia-Lite.” “Chiefalito” lacks euphony, but is more apt, stylistically at least, according to lawyers who know Alito and say his temperament is less like Scalia’s and more like Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s and his successor, John Roberts. “I defy anybody to say anything bad about Sam’s private and professional character,” says Michael Gilberti, a federal-prosecutor-turned-criminal-defense-lawyer who has known Alito since 1980. But Gilberti speaks for Alito’s legion of liberal friends when he says, “I’m a little intimidated by what he might do.” He adds: “I think there are certain issues like abortion where he will erode or try to erode through a conservative approach,” Gilberti says. The Alito opinion that has received the most publicity since his nomination is his dissent in an abortion case that went to the Supreme Court as Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). The 3rd Circuit majority struck down a Pennsylvania law requiring women seeking abortions to notify their spouses. The Supreme Court narrowly affirmed the decision. Had Alito been a justice, he would have sided with Rehnquist, Scalia, Byron White and Clarence Thomas in a dissent that said the notification requirement was not an undue burden on the woman and passed constitutional muster. Strict anti-abortionists, on the other hand, disagreed with an opinion Alito joined, Planned Parenthood v. Farmer, 220 F.3d 127 (2000), that followed Supreme Court doctrine and struck down a New Jersey law banning late-term abortions. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said on Monday after meeting the nominee that Alito, like Roberts during confirmation hearings in September, reaffirmed the principle of stare decisis and recognized the rights to privacy as outlined in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), an underpinning of Supreme Court decisions allowing abortions. Alito has been consistent in championing the rights of individuals and institutions to take part in religious activities in cases in which the establishment clause of the First Amendment and freedom of expression were at issue. In ACLU v. Schundler, F.3d 92 (1999), his majority opinion said a holiday display in Jersey City did not violate the establishment clause because it included nonreligious symbols like snowmen and a banner hailing diversity, in addition to a nativity scene and a menorah. In Fraternal Order of Police, 170 F.3d 359 (1999), he wrote a majority opinion that said Newark could not, on grounds of uniformity, ban the wearing of beards by Muslim police officers. C.H. v. Oliva, 226 F.3d 198 (2001), was a case that pitted two conservative ideals against each other: the right to religious expression in schools and the right of schools to limit free speech. Alito championed religious expression in a dissent championing the right of a student to have his drawing of Jesus in a Thanksgiving display. He wrote for the majority in Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J. v. Stafford Township School, 386 F.3d 514 (2004), that preventing a Bible study group from setting up an informational table at a back-to-school night was viewpoint discrimination. In another case on the conservative-liberal dividing line, he wrote in a dissent in U.S. v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (1996), that a ban on private ownership of machine guns was not a valid exercise of congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. DUE DEFERENCE For the most part, Alito has tended toward deference to decision-making by the police and federal rule-makers in criminal and regulatory cases. In a dissent that disagreed with the reversal of a drug conviction, U.S. v. Russell, 134 F.3d 171 (1998), he came down on the side of caution in findings of plain error by appeals courts. In a case on the effectiveness of counsel in death penalty cases, Rompilla v. Beard, 355 F.3d. 233 (2004), Alito wrote for the majority in affirming a sentence handed down after the defense lawyer failed to review records that might have helped mitigate the sentence. The 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court in June to reverse Alito’s decision demonstrates what is at stake in Alito’s nomination. In a dissent in a race discrimination employment case, Bray v. Marriott Hotels, 110 F.3d 986 (1997), he railed against pro-employee summary judgment standards that allowed claims to survive when a plaintiff could show minor inconsistencies or discrepancies in an employer’s adherence to internal procedures. “He’s very conservative,” says Lawrence Lustberg, a criminal defense lawyer who has handled cases for the American Civil Liberties Union and spent a summer interning in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Newark when Alito was an assistant. “I don’t believe he is going to be a Scalia kind of guy,” Lustberg said. “Scalia is a revolutionary judge. He tries to move the law along with broad strokes. Sam has too much respect for stare decisis and the rule of law. He’s going to move things little by little with well savvily crafty decisions. “This is a debate over whether we want to move this Court to the right, because he is going to move this Court to the right,” Lustberg says. And Lustberg predicts Alito will be confirmed. “He’s going to wow the Judiciary Committee. He’s going to be every bit as impressive as John Roberts in his own soft-spoken way.” IVY LEAGUE PEDIGREE Alito and his sister Rosemary, an employment defense lawyer in the Newark office of Kirkpatrick & Lockart Nicholson Graham, grew up in Hamilton Township. Their mother, Rose, now 91, was an elementary school principal, and their father, Samuel, was an Italian immigrant who went to law school and rose to a powerful position in New Jersey state government: executive director of the bill-drafting Office of Legislative Services. Alito’s father was famous in Trenton for working hard, mastering the intricacies of government and projecting an air of impartiality. After Alito Sr. died in 1987, an aide joked, “If you asked Sam what time it was he would point to the clock; he didn’t want to go out on a limb.” Alito Jr. seems to have inherited his father’s reticence and both his parents’ ability to excel in matters of the mind. He graduated from Princeton in 1972, served in the Army reserve and graduated from Yale Law School in 1975 after serving as editor of the Yale Law Journal. He clerked for 3rd Circuit Judge Leonard Garth, a moderate conservative who still sits as a senior judge on the court, and after four years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in New Jersey took the jobs that catapulted him to attention from conservatives in Washington: assistant to the U.S. solicitor general from 1981 to 1985 and deputy assistant to Attorney General Edwin Meese from 1985 to 1987. He won 12 cases in the Supreme Court, and on Monday, he recalled that kind questioning by O’Connor — the justice he would replace — helped him through his first argument. In 1987, the first President Bush appointed him U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, where he spent much of the time heading a 67-lawyer office that prosecuted mobsters and drug dealers. Bush nominated him to the Court of Appeals in 1990, and he was appointed by unanimous consent after a favorable report from the Senate Judiciary Committee then chaired by Joseph Biden, D-Del. As Roberts did, Alito projects a family-man image. He and his wife Martha — she was the librarian in the U.S. Attorney’s Office — live in solidly suburban North Caldwell, attend Catholic churches in the neighborhood and have two children: Laura, in high school, and Philip, at the University of Virginia.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.