The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Microsoft, refusing to hear its request that its liability in a patent infringement case be limited to domestic sales of its Web browser. Also, the Court refused to disturb New York's system of taxing the income of telecommuters who live elsewhere but are employed by companies in that state. Finally, the Court refused to consider throwing out class action lawsuits that accuse cell phone makers of failing to protect users from unsafe levels of radiation.
November 01, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Microsoft Corp., refusing to hear the software company’s request that its liability in a patent infringement case be limited to domestic sales of its Web browser.
A jury in 2003 ordered Microsoft to pay $521 million for infringing U.S. patents held by Eolas Technologies Inc. and the University of California on code that enables a variety of software applications to work seamlessly with Web browsers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
