Upholding verdicts of more than $60 million, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has rejected appeals by a sprinkler system maker that was held partially liable for a warehouse fire destroying millions of documents. The panel rejected the argument that the sprinkler system was not a "product" as that term is defined in products liability law because it was not completely installed at the time of the fire. The verdicts are the largest ever in Luzerne County, Pa., and stem from the county's longest-running trial.
August 31, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of five years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...
0-5 year associate attorney needed for a civil litigation firm in the Buckheadarea. Great opportunity for advancement. Salary will be commen...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...