Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A law firm did not mislead a professional liability insurer by failing to provide supplemental information about a malpractice claim against it, a New York federal judge has ruled. The insurance company had sought a declaratory judgment that its policy covering lawyers with Horowitz, Greener & Stengel was void as a matter of law because the firm allegedly failed to submit the supplemental information. But the judge said the insurer's failure to insist on the additional information was fatal to its request.
August 05, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS