Office supply giant 3M is facing a trio of antitrust suits over its alleged monopolizing of the market for transparent tape now that a Pennsylvania federal judge has refused to dismiss a suit brought by a class of large-volume retailers. U.S. District Judge John R. Padova rejected 3M's argument that the suit should be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds and because the plaintiffs had failed to state a valid claim of antitrust injury.
August 01, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
Looking for an Associate Attorney with 2 to 5 years experience to handle Labor and Employment Law, Pension Appeals and Workers Compensation....
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Regional mid-sized firm with diverse civil litigation practice seeking hardworking and dedicated attorneys with 1-5 years experience for it...
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
