Ruling that banks have a right to sell their customers' private information to affiliated companies, the 9th Circuit on Monday blocked a portion of California's landmark financial privacy law, the toughest in the nation. Given that the appeals court sent the case back to a lower court for review, the ruling is not the "smashing pre-emption victory" that bankers had sought, said a spokesman for the state's attorney general.
June 22, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal appeals court blocked a portion of California’s landmark financial privacy law, ruling that banks have a right to sell their customers’ private information to affiliated companies.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that federal law pre-empts a portion of California’s 2003 privacy law, the toughest in the nation, but leaves most of it intact.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
