The U.S. Supreme Court won't weigh in on a copyright lawsuit in which printer manufacturer Lexmark is trying to stop Static Control Components, a computer-chip maker, whose parts allowed cheaper toner cartridges to be used in name-brand machines. Lexmark's appeal to the Court was filed late and rejected, so the case will return to a federal district court in Kentucky. Static Control contends that Lexmark engaged in anticompetitive and monopolistic conduct and should pay damages of more than $100 million.
June 08, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.S. Supreme Court won’t weigh in on a closely watched copyright lawsuit in which a printer manufacturer is trying to stop a computer-chip maker whose parts allowed cheaper toner cartridges to be used in name-brand machines.
Lexmark International Inc. said Monday it looks forward to continuing the fight over what it says are its intellectual property rights. The printer maker wants to block Static Control Components Inc. of Sanford, N.C., from selling the computer chips.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...
Exciting Career Opportunities at Nuzzo & Roberts! Nuzzo & Roberts, a leading mid-sized insurance defense firm based in Cheshire, CT...
