Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A New York judge presiding over a contentious divorce should not have barred the husband, an attorney, from representing himself, an appeals court has ruled. The court found that even though the husband's self-representation "may make the litigation process more difficult or unpleasant, the record was inadequate to justify barring him from acting as his own counsel." To ensure no problems arise during confrontations, such as depositions, the court suggested supervision by a special master or referee.
May 27, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS