Like a rock tossed in a lake, the U.S. Supreme Court’s January decision in Booker v. United States that struck down the federal sentencing guidelines had a rippling effect on the lower courts, creating waves of litigation, as criminal defendants at every stage tried to take advantage of it.

Now a clearer picture is emerging of just how far those ripples extend — which defendants will benefit and which ones will be told they have no claim — as, one by one, the federal appellate courts have weighed in on key questions about when Booker applies.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]