Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In an attempt to defuse ideological litmus tests seen as fueling attacks on the judiciary and threatening its independence, the ABA has revised its guidelines for evaluating state court judges. While the old guidelines were meant mainly for self-improvement, the new proposals seek to educate the people who re-elect or reappoint judges. The guidelines ask that judges be judged by objective criteria, including a willingness to make impartial, difficult and unpopular decisions based on law and fact.
May 05, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS