Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A lawyer's "apparent authority" in negotiating on behalf of a client is not enough for a court to enforce the product of those talks, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled. The justices said that, in a case absent of attorney fraud, they would refuse to grant defense motions to enforce such an agreement. The majority opinion made it clear that express authority -- directly from the client -- is necessary before an attorney may craft a settlement that the court would find enforceable.
April 05, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS