Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Resolving a question that has long vexed Pennsylvania appellate jurists, the state Supreme Court has held it is irrelevant to the discovery rule's application whether a plaintiff's injury was ascertainable within the statute of limitations period. The justices also concluded that the statute of limitations tolled under the doctrine of fraudulent concealment begins to run only when an injured party "knows or reasonably should know" the cause of his or her injury or when it occurred.
April 01, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
Duane Morris seeks an associate with 3-4 years of experience to join its Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group in its Philadelp...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS