X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Some 4,000 pro bono hours ago, Eliot Lauer and Jacques Semmelman embarked on a personal and professional quest to liberate convicted spy Jonathan J. Pollard. The thing is, they did not have to do it for free. A wealthy philanthropist who had been Lauer’s client was willing to help bankroll a legal defense fund for Pollard, the infamous civilian naval intelligence officer who sold U.S. intelligence to Israel. As long as there was an issue worth pursuing, the philanthropist was ready with an open wallet. But after reviewing the file, Lauer and Semmelman quickly came to two conclusions: Pollard has a viable claim and they would take no fee. That was 4 1/2 years and a staggering number of unbillable hours ago. “I am doing this because I am a lawyer, I am a Jewish American and I believe that to a large extent the Pollard case is sort of an uncomfortable testing of how comfortable Jews feel in America,” said Lauer who, like his partner, has a busy commercial law and white-collar criminal defense practice at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle. Lauer, 55, would not identify the mystery philanthropist who brought him into the case. “I told [the philanthropist] that I thought Pollard had a case that had to be brought, that I would be interested in doing it, but would prefer to do it pro bono,” he said. “I did that because I believed in the case and believed it was the absolute right thing to do.” Semmelman, 49, a former federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of New York, viewed the matter simply as one where “a tremendous injustice was being done, and I thought I might be able to help.” That remains to be seen. Pollard, 50, lingers in federal prison, where he has spent nearly 20 years. And unless Lauer and Semmelman are very, very good — and perhaps very, very lucky — that is where Pollard could linger for the rest of his days. Today, Lauer and Semmelman will attempt to leap substantial hurdles in a pair of key arguments before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The facts of the case are straightforward. Pollard, while working as a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst, sold highly sensitive, classified material to Israel between June 1984 and November 1985. He insisted he had only provided information he thought Israel, as an ally, was entitled to, and only information he believed Israel needed for its national security. The U.S. government had a different perspective. It claimed Pollard damaged America’s relations with its Arab allies, indirectly altered the balance of power in the Middle East, wreaked havoc on the morale in Navy intelligence and denied the United States an opportunity to demand a quid pro quo bargaining chip in exchange for sharing information with Israel. Then Secretary of Defense Caspar W. Weinberger said he was hard pressed “to conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by” Pollard. Pollard pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to deliver national defense information to a foreign government. Under a plea agreement, the government was barred from requesting the maximum sentence, life in prison. Still, U.S. District Court Judge Aubrey E. Robinson sentenced Pollard to life, apparently the longest sentence ever imposed in this country for passing secrets to an ally. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE BID Over the years, Pollard’s clemency bids and various attempts at appeal have failed. Today in Washington, D.C., he and his attorneys arrive at what could be a pivotal juncture in his case and his life. If they can convince the D.C. Circuit that Pollard has a right, after all these years, to claim ineffective assistance of trial-level counsel, and then persuade the trial court that Pollard’s representation was indeed ineffective, there is a chance of victory and freedom. The ineffective assistance claim, which will be argued by Semmelman, centers on the representation Washington attorney Richard A. Hibey, now of Miller & Chevalier, provided his client nearly two decades ago. “I was appalled at the quality of the legal representation Jonathan received,” Semmelman said in an interview. “It became apparent to us that Jonathan Pollard was sentenced to life not because of what he did, but because of what was done to him.” The list of complaints against Hibey is extensive. According to a brief submitted to the court, Hibey neglected to file any notice of appeal; publicly announced that Pollard had no avenue of appeal; failed to challenge a statement Weinberger submitted to the court all but demanding a life sentence after the government promised not to seek such a sanction; and committed various other errors that denied his client effective representation. Hibey last week declined comment. Because of a statute of limitations question, the ineffective assistance issue is not directly before the circuit. Pollard did not assert his ineffective assistance claim until September 1990, long after the one-year statute of limitations had run. However, Pollard contends he raised the issue as soon as Lauer and Semmelman pointed out to him the series of qualms they had with Hibey’s work. TOP-SECRET FILES Another issue Lauer will argue centers on a 45-page declaration Weinberger submitted to the court in 1987 offering his view of the case and the severity of Pollard’s offense. About 20 pages were filed under security seal. Lauer, who underwent an extensive background check to obtain top-secret security clearance precisely so he could see the file, was denied access. The government claims Lauer can view what is described as “sensitive compartmented information” only on a need-to-know basis, and he has no need to know. Lauer said the question of whether that information is relevant to Pollard’s appeal is a decision for defense counsel, not prosecutors. He points out that government records show that the Justice Department accessed the file some two dozen times. “If on 24 occasions lawyers working with the Department of Justice opposing clemency for Pollard have a need to know, don’t we have at least an equal need to know?” Lauer asked. Joining the appeal are the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists and 14 individuals appearing as amici curiae. Among them are former New York Attorney General Robert Abrams of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan; Notre Dame University President Emeritus Reverend Theodore Hesburgh; retired U.S. District Judge George Leighton of Illinois; and Congressman Anthony D. Weiner, D-Brooklyn. “I believe that by bringing justice to Pollard and the Pollard case, I am helping to clarify our role as Americans — not just Jewish Americans, but as Americans,” Lauer said. “It is a challenge personally, but I believe in a way that the Pollard case is much bigger than Jonathan Pollard himself.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.