X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A federal judge in Brooklyn has ruled that three men caught smuggling cash to Pakistan to help their families do not have to forfeit all the money under the “bulk cash” statute of the USA Patriot Act. In a ruling of first impression, Eastern District Judge Jack B. Weinstein held that civil forfeitures under the act are subject to review under the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was the first Eighth Amendment challenge to the statute, which was enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks to crack down on money sent to overseas terrorist operations. In a civil forfeiture proceeding against the men, federal prosecutors argued that all the money they proved was theirs — $96,000 — should be forfeited. In total, the men were caught with more than $515,000. Most of the money belonged to co-workers and friends and was not subject to the forfeiture proceeding. The government is evaluating claims from those workers in another proceeding before a magistrate judge. Prosecutors provided the judge with extensive data revealing that most instances of smuggling that involve more than $10,000 result in full forfeiture. But Weinstein ruled that U.S. v. Khan, 03-CV-0278, was an exceptional case because the defendants, along with numerous co-workers and acquaintances who gave the defendants their savings, had earned the money legally through successful fried chicken restaurants owned by one of the men. The judge said they did not intend to support terrorism or drug trafficking. Weinstein ruled that the three smugglers, who were each convicted and assessed a $7,500 fine, should forfeit 50 percent of the money they proved was their own. The total came to just over $48,000. Ali Sher Khan, Akbar Ali Khan and Fazal Subhan were arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport as they prepared to fly to Pakistan. Ali Sher Khan and Akbar Khan were about to board the plane; Subhan had already boarded. The three men had declared about $32,000, but authorities found that they were carrying more than $500,000. The men were subsequently indicted for conspiracy to conceal more than $10,000 in currency and making false statements to a government agent. Ali Sher Khan and Subhan were convicted of all counts. Akbar Khan was convicted of all counts except making a false statement. Ali Sher Khan was sentenced to up to 6 months; Akbar Khan, 10 to 16 months; and Subhan, 6 to 12 months. The government moved for full forfeiture under 31 U.S.C.A. �5332, which was enacted as part of the USA Patriot Act in October 2001. The government argued that the law mandated full forfeiture and backed its claim with an extensive table showing that it almost always wins a full penalty in cases of undeclared money. It argued that the new law was essentially exempt from Eighth Amendment review. MONEY EARNED LEGALLY Judge Weinstein disagreed, saying that the statute clearly says property “may” be forfeited as a penalty for violating the law. Since the money was legally earned, Weinstein said, “this percentage appears to be excessive in a case such as the instant one where cash was earned legally and was being taken to the earners’ families.” The judge found that the Eighth Amendment offered the men protection from an excessive fine. “Claimants do not fit in the class of persons for whom the statute was principally designed, namely drug traffickers, terrorists, money launderers, racketeers, tax evaders or similar criminals,” he said. The three men were represented by John Patrick Donohue of Donohue and Donohue in Philadelphia, David Smith of English & Smith in Alexandria, Va., and Bernard H. Udell of Brooklyn. Assistant U.S. Attorney Laura D. Mantell represented the government.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.