Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Richard Grasso will have his day in state court, not federal. The former New York Stock Exchange chairman lost his bid to have the lawsuit over his controversial $187.5 million pay package moved from the New York court where it was filed by state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. District Court Judge Gerard Lynch ruled Thursday the case was best suited for state court, since Spitzer’s case alleges violations of New York law. Spitzer is seeking to take back at least $100 million from Grasso and another $18 million in damages from former NYSE board member Kenneth Langone. Grasso’s public relations firm refused to comment on whether he would appeal the federal court’s ruling, saying that it would not comment on his legal strategy. A spokesman for Grasso said in a statement: “Mr. Grasso believes firmly in the merit of his position and looks forward to his day in court.” Langone spokesman Jim McCarthy said the decision does not alter Langone’s position, and that the former board member was looking forward to his day in court, too. Grasso had asserted that because the NYSE was regulated by the federal Securities and Exchange Commission, he could only be sued in federal court. However, Lynch wrote in his ruling that there were no federal statutes in question in Spitzer’s suit, which claims Grasso and the NYSE violated the state’s not-for-profit law by allowing Grasso “excessive compensation.” “Permitting a state government to enforce the corporate governance norms under which an exchange or self-regulating organization is established violates no policy embodied in the federal securities laws,” Lynch wrote. Spitzer spokesman Marc Violette said the case would be returned to state court, where a judge would schedule further proceedings. “It’s back where it started and from our perspective, it’s back where it rightfully belongs,” Violette said. “Since we’re alleging violations of state laws against an entity with the state, it always seemed appropriate and logical that it should be heard in state court.” Spitzer sued Grasso and former NYSE board member Kenneth G. Langone on May 24 in state court, claiming the two hid information from the board’s compensation committee in approving Grasso’s pay package. Grasso resigned as chairman and chief executive of the NYSE in September 2004, one month after the pay package was approved. The exchange itself was also named as a defendant in Spitzer’s case, but the attorney general said he would not seek damages from it, and offered assurances that any money he did win back would be returned to the exchange. NYSE lawyers are working closely with Spitzer’s office on the case. Grasso countersued the NYSE in July, seeking damages for breach of contract and defamation. He said he plans to donate any damages he receives to charity. Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.