Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Rejecting federal precedent, the California Supreme Court clarified, but refused to abolish, catalyst fees in the state Thursday. The 4-3 votes affirmed that such fees -- awarded to parties whose suits result in changes beneficial to the public -- are permissible in private attorney general actions, but only if they are based on meritorious complaints and there has been a "reasonable attempt" to settle. Dissenting justices accused the majority of going farther than any other court.
December 03, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS