Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Lawyers for an alleged al-Qaida member have filed an unusual appeal at the Supreme Court challenging the government’s strategy in holding military trials for terror suspects in Cuba. Earlier this month a federal judge blocked the first planned trial, and lawyers for the accused enemy combatant in that case are trying to bypass an appeals court and get the issue before the high court immediately. The Bush administration has defended its plans for military commission trials, resurrected from World War II, at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. U.S. District Judge James Robertson said the government must first determine that the suspects are not prisoners of war and entitled to more legal rights. He also ruled that the guidelines for the trials must be changed. An appeals court had agreed to hear the administration’s appeal on a fast-track schedule, but the Supreme Court was asked late Monday to hear the case before a decision is reached by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Such direct appeals to the Supreme Court are rare. The appeal filed on behalf of Osama bin Laden’s driver said that courts, alleged enemy combatants “and the world community stand to benefit from clear guidance as to how the United States may wage the legal war on terror in the future.” “Our country has a pressing need to know that those implicated in that war are being treated in the way the Constitution, our statutes, and the laws of war demand,” Washington attorney Neal Katyal wrote in the appeal for of Salim Ahmed Hamdan. Hamdan, 34, of Yemen, is charged with conspiracy to commit war crimes, murder and terrorism. He says that he never supported terrorism. The government has been holding Hamdan and about 550 other men from more than 40 countries in Cuba, including some for nearly three years. Few have had access to attorneys and only four have been charged. The Supreme Court ruled in June that prisoners at Guantanamo Bay may challenge their captivity in American courts, a major defeat for the Bush administration. The latest case is Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.