A police officer who was forced to provide a hair sample when he was suspected of drug use may not sue for alleged violations of his Fourth Amendment rights -- even if the sampling required shaving patches from his head -- because hair is "on public display," and the taking of a sample therefore cannot be considered a search, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
November 08, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Global Leaders in Consulting awards are for those who are making a big impression within the industry, but also worldwide.
Aimed to help Insurers prevent, prepare and prevail In adjudicating complex claims, negotiating settlements and winning cases.
Women, Influence & Power in Law UK Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
The New York office of Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an attorney to work at the level of a mid-level or senior associate to join its...
The Los Angeles office of Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an attorney to work at the level of a mid-level associate in its growing nat...
The Newark office of Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an attorney to work at the level of a mid-level or senior associate in its growin...
Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP would like to congratulate Jerry Lehocky and his team on PA's largest workers' compensation settlement.