Just two months after office supply giant 3M's petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected and it learned that it was stuck with a $68 million antitrust verdict for monopolizing the market for transparent tape, a federal judge has certified a class action lawsuit brought by direct purchasers of 3M's Scotch and Highland brand tapes. The judge ruled that the plaintiff's lawyers cured potential conflicts by narrowing the class.
August 25, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of five years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...
0-5 year associate attorney needed for a civil litigation firm in the Buckheadarea. Great opportunity for advancement. Salary will be commen...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...
