Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Under an insurance policy covering a policyholder's cost in defending against abuse of process cases, the defense of a patent invalidity suit is not included, a common pleas judge has ruled in a case in the Philadelphia commerce program. Judge Albert W. Sheppard Jr. reasoned that a patent invalidity claim is not akin to an abuse of process claim. Therefore, a policyholder could not tap into its coverage against allegations of abuse of process.
February 10, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS